![]()  | 
       
 
Vol. 8, No. 1 January-March 2002
  
 
 
  | 
        | 
      
        
 Network-Based Resource Brokerage Models for Disaster Response and Recovery Disaster victims and responders face
        all kinds of resource shortages: of supplies, of equipment, of skilled
        personnel. Paradoxically, the experience of a resource manager in a
        large disaster often is precisely the opposite: the challenge they face
        in many disasters is not scarcity but glut. They know what it means for
        available management systems to be overrun by a sudden influx of too
        many resources, too many requirements, too much information.
        Nonetheless, many disaster resource-management systems are designed,
        with the best of intentions, more in sympathy with perceived shortages
        in the disaster area than with the reality of “resource surge” at
        the response-management level.
    
     The usual approach is to establish
        central “clearinghouses” through which resources can be inventoried,
        allocated and dispatched. In theory, such centers yield optimal
        allocation of limited resources and efficient distribution and
        utilization. This approach is uncontroversial, applying day-to-day
        methods on an expanded scale. When principle meets practice, though,
        what seemed like a humane and efficient solution can prove less than
        ideal. In after-action reports, two complaints appear repeatedly:
         In both cases, the efficiency and
        control of a central clearinghouse were offset, even negated, by
        artifacts of the system’s own functioning. Because disaster-management
        systems are (fortunately) infrequently used, such lurking inefficiencies
        can pass unrecognized for years.
        
         Information technology offers
        opportunities for improving emergency management. Computers can simply
        support and accelerate traditional, paper-oriented processes. Recently,
        though, a subtler network-based approach to resource management has
        shown how information technology can not just overpower problems, but
        sometimes actually redefine them.
        
         This network-based approach supplements
        the clearinghouse with an automated online “brokerage” where
        resource providers can coordinate directly with those in need. The
        “single process” of the clearinghouse becomes a “massively
        parallel” network of simultaneous negotiations and arrangements. The
        apparent control and efficiency of centralization are sacrificed to
        avoid its less-obvious costs.
        
         Three
        examples of the network-brokerage model in the USA:
         It can be argued that the
        network-brokerage approach reflects a uniquely American
        emergency-management culture with a history of inter-jurisdictional
        mutual aid arrangements. Nonetheless, as online auctions, instant
        messaging and the like become more familiar worldwide, we can expect to
        see the emergence of other novel network-centered approaches to
        traditional emergency management problems.
        
        Art
        Botterell has served in local, state and federal emergency management in
        the USA and now consults on emergency-management and
        crisis-communications systems in North America and Asia
          | 
| Newsletter | Disaster Links | ADPC Home | 
       Information, Research & Network Support 
        Asian Disaster Preparedness Center
        P.O.Box 4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand.
        Tel: (66-2) 524-5378; Fax: (66-2) 524-5360; Email:kamal@ait.ac.th