Vol. 8, No. 1 January-March 2002
|
Network-Based Resource Brokerage Models for Disaster Response and Recovery Disaster victims and responders face
all kinds of resource shortages: of supplies, of equipment, of skilled
personnel. Paradoxically, the experience of a resource manager in a
large disaster often is precisely the opposite: the challenge they face
in many disasters is not scarcity but glut. They know what it means for
available management systems to be overrun by a sudden influx of too
many resources, too many requirements, too much information.
Nonetheless, many disaster resource-management systems are designed,
with the best of intentions, more in sympathy with perceived shortages
in the disaster area than with the reality of “resource surge” at
the response-management level.
The usual approach is to establish
central “clearinghouses” through which resources can be inventoried,
allocated and dispatched. In theory, such centers yield optimal
allocation of limited resources and efficient distribution and
utilization. This approach is uncontroversial, applying day-to-day
methods on an expanded scale. When principle meets practice, though,
what seemed like a humane and efficient solution can prove less than
ideal. In after-action reports, two complaints appear repeatedly:
In both cases, the efficiency and
control of a central clearinghouse were offset, even negated, by
artifacts of the system’s own functioning. Because disaster-management
systems are (fortunately) infrequently used, such lurking inefficiencies
can pass unrecognized for years.
Information technology offers
opportunities for improving emergency management. Computers can simply
support and accelerate traditional, paper-oriented processes. Recently,
though, a subtler network-based approach to resource management has
shown how information technology can not just overpower problems, but
sometimes actually redefine them.
This network-based approach supplements
the clearinghouse with an automated online “brokerage” where
resource providers can coordinate directly with those in need. The
“single process” of the clearinghouse becomes a “massively
parallel” network of simultaneous negotiations and arrangements. The
apparent control and efficiency of centralization are sacrificed to
avoid its less-obvious costs.
Three
examples of the network-brokerage model in the USA:
It can be argued that the
network-brokerage approach reflects a uniquely American
emergency-management culture with a history of inter-jurisdictional
mutual aid arrangements. Nonetheless, as online auctions, instant
messaging and the like become more familiar worldwide, we can expect to
see the emergence of other novel network-centered approaches to
traditional emergency management problems.
Art
Botterell has served in local, state and federal emergency management in
the USA and now consults on emergency-management and
crisis-communications systems in North America and Asia
|
Newsletter | Disaster Links | ADPC Home |
Information, Research & Network Support
Asian Disaster Preparedness Center
P.O.Box 4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand.
Tel: (66-2) 524-5378; Fax: (66-2) 524-5360; Email:kamal@ait.ac.th