ADPC Banner

Asian Disaster Management News banner


Vol. 8, No. 1 January-March 2002

Back to Contents
Editor's Corner
Theme
From the Grassroots
Insight
ADPC Programs & Activities
Training & Education
AUDMP Making cities safer
Bookmarks
Book Review
WWW Sites

 

THEME

Network-Based Resource Brokerage Models for Disaster Response and Recovery

Disaster victims and responders face all kinds of resource shortages: of supplies, of equipment, of skilled personnel. Paradoxically, the experience of a resource manager in a large disaster often is precisely the opposite: the challenge they face in many disasters is not scarcity but glut. They know what it means for available management systems to be overrun by a sudden influx of too many resources, too many requirements, too much information. Nonetheless, many disaster resource-management systems are designed, with the best of intentions, more in sympathy with perceived shortages in the disaster area than with the reality of “resource surge” at the response-management level.

The usual approach is to establish central “clearinghouses” through which resources can be inventoried, allocated and dispatched. In theory, such centers yield optimal allocation of limited resources and efficient distribution and utilization. This approach is uncontroversial, applying day-to-day methods on an expanded scale. When principle meets practice, though, what seemed like a humane and efficient solution can prove less than ideal. In after-action reports, two complaints appear repeatedly:

  • Overwhelmed with its processing tasks, the central clearinghouse becomes a bottleneck, a common media critique of some vital resource that was located close to a need, but was not utilized because of “red tape.”
  • Unable to deal with the full complexity of local conditions, the clearinghouse imposes arbitrary standardized practices that actually inhibit the use of resources – “wasted” supplies dispatched in standard quantities that were ill-matched to local needs.

In both cases, the efficiency and control of a central clearinghouse were offset, even negated, by artifacts of the system’s own functioning. Because disaster-management systems are (fortunately) infrequently used, such lurking inefficiencies can pass unrecognized for years.

Information technology offers opportunities for improving emergency management. Computers can simply support and accelerate traditional, paper-oriented processes. Recently, though, a subtler network-based approach to resource management has shown how information technology can not just overpower problems, but sometimes actually redefine them.

This network-based approach supplements the clearinghouse with an automated online “brokerage” where resource providers can coordinate directly with those in need. The “single process” of the clearinghouse becomes a “massively parallel” network of simultaneous negotiations and arrangements. The apparent control and efficiency of centralization are sacrificed to avoid its less-obvious costs.

Three examples of the network-brokerage model in the USA:

  • In California’s Silicon Valley emergency managers’ resource requests are posted to a shared database. Any agency that can provide the required resource – or suggest an alternative – contacts the requester and works out arrangements. When satisfied, the requester enters the details into the database for documentation.
  • The “Emergency Asset Management System” (http://www.eams.org/) manages the often-overwhelming flow of voluntary donations to emergency relief. Here, providers “advertise” their donations in an online database. If the donation is needed somewhere, delivery arrangements are made directly, with the database recording the details for future reference.
  • HeroNet is an effort to build an online registry where volunteers, especially those with special skills, can offer their services for emergency response. In addition to a self-maintained roster of volunteers, HeroNet will create pre-disaster communities of interests and skills, creating opportunities for additional training and development.

It can be argued that the network-brokerage approach reflects a uniquely American emergency-management culture with a history of inter-jurisdictional mutual aid arrangements. Nonetheless, as online auctions, instant messaging and the like become more familiar worldwide, we can expect to see the emergence of other novel network-centered approaches to traditional emergency management problems.

Art Botterell has served in local, state and federal emergency management in the USA and now consults on emergency-management and crisis-communications systems in North America and Asia

Newsletter Disaster Links ADPC Home

Information, Research & Network Support
Asian Disaster Preparedness Center
P.O.Box 4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand.
Tel: (66-2) 524-5378; Fax: (66-2) 524-5360; Email:
kamal@ait.ac.th